3 ms·
A new city would be much denser than the suburban and exurban sprawl that currently fills our demand for new housing, and so would end up in taking much less fa
by cbr 10y ago
A new city would be much denser than the suburban and exurban sprawl that currently fills our demand for new housing, and so would end up in taking much less farmland than continuing along the current path.
(And the amount of farmland we're talking about, both for new cities and for sprawl, is small as a fraction of total farmland.)
- jonathankoren 10y agoOr you could infill the existing urban and suburban areas, and not lose any food production. This idea of building a brand new city is just stupid.