4 ms·
The best way to make sure they (we, since I work at Microsoft) get the feedback is by finding out where the product is listening. A lot of products have UserVo
by jongalloway2 10y ago
The best way to make sure they (we, since I work at Microsoft) get the feedback is by finding out where the product is listening.
A lot of products have UserVoice set up, a lot of dev product teams (dotnet, asp.net, etc.) are looking for GitHub issues.
For Windows 10 I'd recommend using the Windows 10 Feedback Hub - if you hate something about Windows 10, post feedback in the Feedback Hub before you uninstall it.
Visual Studio has this page that explains where best to submit feedback / bugs / feature requests: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b8akas30.aspx https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b8akas30.aspx
There are lots of us who see your comments on HN / Reddit / Slashdot / etc. but having been part of the Microsoft ecosystem (both inside and out of Microsoft) for many years, I can tell you that there's a huge difference between "I've seen some unhappy comments about X" and "Our feedback numbers show 68% of users want us to improve feature X". Also, specifics are important - a detailed issue report with repro steps and recommendations for what you'd like to see work a whole lot better than "@drunkvs LOL VS suxxxx ikr!!!"
Also, just because I'm an ocd fact checker, Ballmer technically didn't say "open source is a cancer". He said that Linux is a cancer, referring to the strong copyleft license requirements (https://web.archive.org/web/20011211130654/http://www.suntimes.com/output/tech/cst-fin-micro01.html https://web.archive.org/web/20011211130654/http://www.suntim...). [yes, I very well know that you can run software on Linux without that software being GPL. I'm writing this from Red Hat DevNation :)]
Regardless, I can tell you that our current CEO and everyone I work with is excited about writing great software that runs everywhere.
- 616c 10y agoWell I tried that once or twice in the Connect era. But if you say it will make a difference this time, next time I have issues I will contribute. And yeah, that cancer line was meant to snarky and cute, not factual. It does not really matter more than me indicating the obvious, that this is a big culture shift if you look at the timeline. I think MS has ways to go too, and the long game is where we will see how it fares, but I want to make sure we encourage the good. Or it will languish, as "no one cared after a while."
- jongalloway2 10y agoYeah, please try again. The problem with a lot of Connect programs is that they were tied to a specific release (MonkeyManager Pro 2008) so bugs that didn't make the cut for the product release just got lost in space (not picked up for MonkeyManager Pro 2010). Part of the reason was that there were always internal bug tracking systems, which was what the dev team was really working from day to day, and these other systems were just inputs to that. If you look at any of the projects that are on GitHub now, the public issues list is the issues list. You can see all the dev comments, scheduling via labels, pull requests, code reviews, etc. https://github.com/aspnet/mvc/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed https://github.com/aspnet/mvc/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclose... https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Ac... For products that aren't on GitHub, public issue lists like UserVoice have still been a big improvement (in my opinion) because they usually keep the bugs / issues / feedback around until it's fixed, and the votes accumulate so the important issues keep bubbling up.
- voltagex_ 10y agoI had a couple of reports on Connect related to crashes in Edge on Xbox disappear as part of a migration - the best I can work out they've become private/internal. I'm assuming those kinds of things are going to UserVoice and not GitHub but is there some way I can find out what happened in the end?