3 ms·
Rather than downvote, I'd love to see some links regarding if the Post has a liberal bias, that they knew they were publishing inaccurate and misleading informa
by th0ma5 10y ago
Rather than downvote, I'd love to see some links regarding if the Post has a liberal bias, that they knew they were publishing inaccurate and misleading information and did so willingly with intent to deceive, and evidence that they want their readers to be angry against the Brexit votes.
I totally agree with your other, factual statements, Bezos I'm sure doesn't care for Trump, and does indeed probably support Gawker. I just can't find anywhere in the world literature any evidence that supports your other claims. Or I guess I wouldn't would I?
- bduerst 10y agoSame here. It's seems to me they're trying to spread F.U.D., but I would love to read more if it's backed up. On the flip side of the coin, some typically conservative media tried to use Google Trends to prove manipulation of instant search results to be pro-Hillary [1], with the same results of not really undestanding how instant search really works [2][3]. [1] http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/06/10/google-burying-anti-clinton-search-results/ http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/06/10/google-burying-anti... [2] http://www.vox.com/2016/6/10/11903028/hillary-clinton-google-debunked http://www.vox.com/2016/6/10/11903028/hillary-clinton-google... [3] https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/google-instant-behind-scenes.html https://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/google-instant-behin...