No, because the information in articles is usually available in literally hundreds of other places with nearly identical content. That someone on Hacker News su

No, because the information in articles is usually available in literally hundreds of other places with nearly identical content. That someone on Hacker News submitted a paywalled article is not a reason to support them, it's more an argument to provide a different source. WaPo is just as much "junk" as many other sites, depending on your perspective.