3 ms·
>10-Year Exercise Periods Make Sense >I agree with Adam's post >I don't think companies should take back stock compensation on a technicality. Isn't a 10-yea
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
>10-Year Exercise Periods Make Sense
>I agree with Adam's post
>I don't think companies should take back stock compensation on a technicality.
Isn't a 10-year period a technicality?
Anything that can take back compensation is a technicality.
Heh, can't even get a response without downmods.
- dmansen 10y agohere you go your post doesn't add anything to the conversation it might technically be a technicality but 10 years is long enough in startup life units that it doesn't matter you're pointing out definitions when it was clear what the author meant and people don't like that because it's very annoying
- jsprogrammer 10y agoIf it is technically a technicality, which it is, then all the other fluff pieces and unpunctuated sentences in the world do not matter. Maybe you could elucidate sama's "clear" meaning? It was lost on me. As far as I can tell, the post adds nothing but confusion to this conversation (you could counter by pointing out something of value contributed by the post). Annoying is when people continually post contradictory or unclear things and never respond to their rightful critiques, or even change their future actions.
- dmansen 10y agoyou said you wanted a response and not just downvotes. i tried ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- jsprogrammer 10y agoThank you for the effort. The sama account rarely makes responses and Sam Altman basically never responds to criticism of his pieces, or even outright proofs of wrongness. Honestly, this is the treatment I expect to receive here.