4 ms·
I hear 2.3 support is coming in the next few weeks. Being stuck on an old version is painful but if your needs are simple then it's very useful. Ultimately if
by skywhopper 10y ago
I hear 2.3 support is coming in the next few weeks.
Being stuck on an old version is painful but if your needs are simple then it's very useful. Ultimately if your needs are not simple then you probably should be running it yourself, just like anything else. Managed hosting for any database is never going to be as customizeable as you need if you operate at a huge scale.
- donretag 10y agoMy sources tell me it is version 2.2 at the end of June (now) or July.
- dcosson 10y agoThis intel is like gold, where'd you hear it from? The lack of transparency is my least favorite thing about AWS. I see the value in keeping brand new services or huge feature additions secret until they're released. But for small issues like when they'll update elasticsearch version or when they'll fix an acknowledged bug, I don't get why they can't share that information with customers (e.g. the way many open source projects track next version milestones on github). Is it any different at the Enterprise support level?
- notyourwork 10y ago> The lack of transparency is my least favorite thing about AWS. What do you expect from AWS? They are part of a publicly traded company, they cannot make announcements willy nilly.
- skywhopper 10y agoIf you pay for top-level support and spend a lot of money on the services you can get some information ahead of time, but it's all strictly under NDA. The more money you spend the more open the teams are willing to be, but they are understandably cagey about committing to timelines until features are imminent.