All fine points, but generally in democracy, the time to educate the voting public and raise issues like disenfranchisement is before the vote, not after. Obvi

All fine points, but generally in democracy, the time to educate the voting public and raise issues like disenfranchisement is before the vote, not after. Obviously, the losing side of any politcal battle will always want a redo. And obviously the winners will always prefer to keep the results as they are. Letting the losers try again until they win is like a DOS attack. Btw, I totally agree though that leaving something like succession up to a simple majority is crazy. Seems 2/3 is more appropriate for big things like this, going to war, and what not.