On 2 and 3 - this is dead right. As an example of 3) Here's a question that has an accepted answers that is wrong http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7635013 ht

On 2 and 3 - this is dead right. As an example of 3) Here's a question that has an accepted answers that is wrong http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7635013 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7635013 - it's regarding x86, x86_64 and x32. Since x32 was new/unknown at the time, a lot of the answers say "x32 doesn't exist". And for 2) here's an answer http://stackoverflow.com/a/26522110 http://stackoverflow.com/a/26522110 that is/was true at the time of writing - a nasty little bug in the Android NDK causes math library functions to not get linked in on pre-lollipop devices if you state you are using android platform 21 and ndk 10c. Two rules lawyers are spouting off about how the poster should post a new question or leave a comment. They are in over their heads. The comments are out of context and come across as patronizing. It is also now an example of 3) since all the tech involved is pretty old in Android terms.