> you literally do not possess you don't seem to understand what the word literally means, and are appropriating it to further your own intellectual dishonesty

> you literally do not possess you don't seem to understand what the word literally means, and are appropriating it to further your own intellectual dishonesty. "Literally" has such an intuitive meaning and I find that your violent disinclination to conform to the norms of positive contributers to society to be deeply frustrating. > It's not like an isolated incident, it is literally his primary rhetorical device in nearly everything he's written over the last 3 decades. This is just hyperbole. You might have some legitimate arguments hidden in your vitriolic strawman-riddled banter, but as is, you are alienating the readers of your comments. In future, please try give your arguments a fighting chance, and not place a rod into the front wheel of your moving bicycle. (Point of my post: I think you're nitpicking on something insignificant and dismissing the entire argument based on that.)