7 ms·
Is anybody aware of alternatives? I'd like to compare before deciding which one to embrace.
by factorialboy 10y ago
Is anybody aware of alternatives? I'd like to compare before deciding which one to embrace.
- sleazebreeze 10y agoI am most familiar with Telerik's free product Fiddler. Looks like a similar feature set to Charles. http://www.telerik.com/fiddler http://www.telerik.com/fiddler
- spo81rty 10y agoOn Windows at least, Fiddler has always been the tool of choice for this amongst everyone I know too.
- mateuszf 10y agoI like mitmproxy
- hartator 10y agoFiddler is free and it's way better. But only on Windows.
- elorant 10y agoI like Fiddler, although I use Charles almost every day. The advantage of Fiddler is that it has an API to program the shit out of it. It's .NET based and only for Windows. Wireshark is also great but has a steep learning curve.
- leakybit 10y agoFiddler works fine on Ubuntu if you run it with mono.
- marvel_boy 10y agomitmproxy is a fantastic tool, multiplatform (I use every day on Mac) and free. Support is great. https://mitmproxy.org https://mitmproxy.org
- notduncansmith 10y agoI use Cello from the Mac App Store and I quite like it. I used to use mitmproxy, you can't interrupt/modify responses in Cello like you can with mitmproxy.
- samhunta 10y agoBetwixt is a great tool that works on all operating systems and allows you to use Chrome Dev Tools to debug web requests https://github.com/kdzwinel/betwixt https://github.com/kdzwinel/betwixt
- maqr 10y agoI've tried fiddler, charles, mitmproxy, burp suite, etc, but the best one I've found is ZAProxy: https://github.com/zaproxy/zaproxy https://github.com/zaproxy/zaproxy The point and click scripting it does is pretty neat. Makes it easy to stub out responses if you happen to be a client developer blocked by your server developers.