Ask HN: How to measure if it is “worth it” to accept a job with less coding?

Hey HN. I have a dilemma. I will get an offer transitioning me from developer to developer team lead at my company. This is being described as being a job with more responsibility and more administrative work (i.e client communication for example). It is also described as being higher paid. My boss knows me very well, and knows I like to code more than to write emails and following up my co-workers. But I also see his motivation, as I am the most obvious candidate for it. Now, in the conversation where the management wanted me to know this, I recognised it as an opportunity (nice on my CV and such), and said I would have to see the offer before I finally said yes. So my dilemma is this. Being a less interesting job-title, I feel there is a certain amount of salary increase required for me to accept the job. If it was only to look good on my CV I would have said no right away. But I am not sure what the lowest level of increased salary would be. Would love to hear some thoughts on it. I guess my question is: What would be the minimum (for example in percentage) increase in pay you would recognise as good enough for you to take a job that would look good on your CV, but be less interesting on a day-to-day basis? A little context: - I live in Norway. - My salary is around 480K NOK (currently 55.3K USD) - I work as a web developer (5-6 yrs professional experience, no tech education).