You know what depresses me about these articles, besides the obviously sad point of a country banning strong encryption: Why are people so obsessed with writing

You know what depresses me about these articles, besides the obviously sad point of a country banning strong encryption: Why are people so obsessed with writing out huge numbers and making up arbitrary false statements, just to impress the uninformed and uneducated? From the article: > one would need a whopping 115, 792, 089, 237, 316, 195, 423, 570, 985, 008, 687, 907, 853, 269, 984, 665, 640, 564, 039, 457, 584, 007, 913, 129, 639, 935 key combinations > which is almost impossible for even a super computer. These digits (it's the decimal representation of 2^256-1) don't add anything to the content of an article. > Decrypting a single 256-bit encrypted message would take hundreds of years, Yadav said. This number ("undreds of years" might be true, false, too high, too low taking anything from the number of CPUs/ASICs crunching to speculations on quantum computers or breakthroughs in mathematics and cryptoanalysis into acocunt) is just pulled out of thin air.