3 ms·
You're stretching the definitions of "read-access" and "publicly accessible." The word you're looking for is "annoying" which is already implied by "nag prompt
by jklinger410 10y ago
You're stretching the definitions of "read-access" and "publicly accessible."
The word you're looking for is "annoying" which is already implied by "nag prompt."
- exodust 10y agoBlocking content deliberately is an accessibility issue, solved only by signing up to Facebook. Not cool when all I wanted to do was read some words, not "use Facebook".
- jklinger410 10y agoThe content is still entirely readable. I'm not arguing that it's not annoying, I'm just saying you're over-exaggerating.
- exodust 10y agoYeah probably, but then again "entirely readable" is generous considering on my laptop screen 30+% of the page is covered needlessly by a panel with no dismiss button. "Public post" redefined to mean 30% less screen layout than only a few months ago. You could look at it that way... 2016 rolls in and quietly, Facebook reduces your web publish layout area by 30% without word. If member I'd be asking what's up with that. Answer might be that you are not CEO of your own contributions on fb.