Sounds like you are up against the echo chamber of the soft sciences. Logic and standards of proof are out the window. There is no point in arguing against such

Sounds like you are up against the echo chamber of the soft sciences. Logic and standards of proof are out the window. There is no point in arguing against such points of view, since who is right is predefined and the result of pseudoacademic popularity contests - not science. Soft sciences these days are for people that want to appear as though educated, but don't want to be burdened by evidence, proofs etc. It is time to clear the fog on that matter.