8 ms·
I've heard this too and thought it was brilliant. So James Cameron even repeated this and added constraints on the music with the second movie James Horner
by msane 10y ago
I've heard this too and thought it was brilliant. So James Cameron even repeated this and added constraints on the music with the second movie
James Horner thought he’d have six weeks to write
the musical score. Instead, he had three weeks,
and had to write some parts overnight. The movie
was behind schedule, not even finished being
filmed (let alone edited) when Horner arrived in
England. What’s more, the recording studio he’d
been provided with was outmoded, not equipped to
handle the synthesizers he wanted to use. Horner
called the experience a “nightmare,” and ended up
writing the climactic musical cue overnight.
Coming away with the impression that a James
Cameron film was too stressful and rushed, he
figured he’d never work with the director again.
And he didn’t ... until Cameron approached him for
Titanic. (That rushed Aliens score earned Horner
an Oscar nomination, by the way.)
It seems like there's a Machiavellian lesson there. There's a lot of great "making of" material on Aliens, which shows James Cameron being a genius on other aspects too.
- dspillett 10y agoThis is quite a common story and one I can relate to. Some of my best work has been done under time pressure, I think in part because you don't have the luxury of second guessing anything. Some of my worst work has been done in the same conditions though, especially with regard to "technical debt" though I suppose that doesn't apply to the processes in film making as future maintenance is much less of a concern.