3 ms·
Great points, I understand your idea about hacking a system. But PG alludes to "obedience" in his comment and "middle of the road" people, leading me to belie
by coryl 17y ago
Great points, I understand your idea about hacking a system.
But PG alludes to "obedience" in his comment and "middle of the road" people, leading me to believe he wants to see some sort of gain over the system. A rube goldberg machine doesn't really fit that profile. Fixing your guitar up doesn't really beat the system. Sure you hacked it up and saved money, but did it really show how clever you are? (Not that I'm saying you aren't)
- Rust 17y agoI consider what I did to my guitar beating the system ;) But then, I'm a guitarist so that's in my domain. It would have been cheaper to just get middle-of-the-road pickups instead - less money, less gain (in a signal-strength sense). Having said that, I understand your point. My examples were not necessarily about beating a system, but changing how that system relates to myself (or whomever). And I did get to type the phrase "file their nuts" with a straight face. Inconveniently, I am having trouble coming up with relevant examples of ethical, non-computer hacking resulting in some sort of net gain unrelated to a select niche of people (like guitarists). I'll have to get back to you on that one...