3 ms·

Please keep comments constructive. This does not help the original questioner, who may not understand why it isn't a fantastic analogy. Please either refrain fr

Please keep comments constructive. This does not help the original questioner, who may not understand why it isn't a fantastic analogy. Please either refrain from the negative commentary, or enhance the conversation by clarifying why you feel it is lacking.

placeybordeaux 10y ago
In this case the poker analogy is terrible because in this case flush is talking about a physical surface being unbroken while poker is talking about a collection of items all being the same.
- cglace 10y ago
  Wouldn't that be a very similar meaning? An unbroken chain of cards of the same suit? Makes sense to me.
  - xapata 10y ago
    I think a flush in poker may have been more inspired by the sense of being full -- "flush with cash".