4 ms·
Note, article is not talking about bit rot, I think that's confusing a lot of people. The point might be clearer as: "Adaptability and efficiency are opposing
by brownbat 10y ago
Note, article is not talking about bit rot, I think that's confusing a lot of people.
The point might be clearer as:
"Adaptability and efficiency are opposing priorities."
Ecosystems face this too. A stable environment will lead to adaptations that improve efficiency, while creating new dependencies on everything staying the same. In a sense, species are constantly competing to make the ecosystem more fragile.
If this holds, there are broad impacts to information systems outside of software. broader impact of this. We like to fantasize about the mind being immortal. Maybe we could fix the telemere thing, figure out cancer, hop our brain to a clone, or upload our consciousness to some cloud.
But in my experience, being mentally alive involves some mix of plasticity and progressive refinement. You can't have both forever.
- bernardlunn 10y ago"Adaptability and efficiency are opposing priorities." Great summary. Means I don't need to reach the OP
- SilasX 10y agoThere's a similar relationship between "regularity/predictability of an environment" and "how much optimization is possible".
- TeMPOraL 10y agoNot sure which way you say the relationship goes. My first guess would be that the more regular/predictable an environment is, the more optimizations are possible.
- SilasX 10y agoThat's correct. Optimization isn't really possible in a "white noise universe". The less regular the universe is, the more general and less specialized your solution can be.