4 ms·
Going out on a tangent - Would California be more successful leaving the US as an independent country? As things stand, California is currently the eighth larg
by _audakel 10y ago
Going out on a tangent - Would California be more successful leaving the US as an independent country?
As things stand, California is currently the eighth largest economy in the world on their own. 17 of the top 30 U.S. tech companies are in California, which should come as no surprise. Tourism, entertainment, biotech, and agriculture are multibillion dollar industries already. Aerospace and defense contracts still rake in around $25bn a year. And many state business leaders are increasingly showing a real commitment to renewable energy.
Overall, while I believe there is definitely more potential for a social democratic style of government if California were its own country, the changes would not be that drastic. Barring a major collapse, California would, like Canada, still remain in the U.S.'s economic and cultural shadow. And who knows? Secession might be the best thing to happen to other states like Texas, New York, and Massachusetts. Who else would be capable of filling the void left in the energy, media, and technology industries? There is certainly upside in such a move but also a great deal of risk.
- superswordfish 10y agoI forget the exact amount (it's likely changed), but CA is one state that is subsidizing the rest of the country. It was somewhere in the ballpark of $0.20 received for every $1.00 given.
- vacri 10y agoThere is no legal path for a state to leave the union once it joins. Membership is permanent, so if you want to secede from the US, you have to do so against it's laws, which basically means armed uprising. There's no state which wants independence so much that enough of their people would actually go to war over it.