5 ms·
The number is arbitrary though. Why not 60 or 63 etc..? I don't think it should even have been voted on. Direct democracy makes no sense when 99 pct of those vo
by thesimpsons1022 10y ago
The number is arbitrary though. Why not 60 or 63 etc..? I don't think it should even have been voted on. Direct democracy makes
no sense when 99 pct of those voting don't understand the issue. We are dealing with extremely complex economic and political webs. When experts are ignored everyone fails.