3 ms·
Isn't this totally anti-democracy? Despite it not being legally binding, it seems totally in contrary to the people's will. I don't understand positively talkin
by MichaelGG 10y ago
Isn't this totally anti-democracy? Despite it not being legally binding, it seems totally in contrary to the people's will. I don't understand positively talking about going opposite of what people voted for.
It seems especially odd since it's usually the Leave side that's accused of being fascist.
Or is the idea to do more polling until a favourable outcome is received?
- exit 10y agovoted for by a 4% margin. don't kid yourself about what democracy actually represents - it's not a united will. i wonder how many of those 4% will even be alive + not senile by the time this plays out.
- de_Selby 10y agoThey already appear to be senile..
- collyw 10y agoWhile I agree with what you say, there is very little of what I consider democracy involved in our media manipulated first past the post system. When the winning side basically backed out of their promises within hours of the result is it really democratic?