3 ms·
While the robot is definitely impressive, without substantial AI in it, I dont think it qualifies to be called a 'scientist' just yet. It clearly cannot appreci
by khelloworld 17y ago
While the robot is definitely impressive, without substantial AI in it, I dont think it qualifies to be called a 'scientist' just yet. It clearly cannot appreciate what its doing -- it might just as well have been cleaning the dishes.
- PhilipReiser 17y agoAs a former member of this research group, I can tell you are spouting nonsense and I think you had better run along and read the paper before making derogatory comments. It's just that people and media are far more interested in seeing robots than in seeing software. FYI: I have spent the last 10 years working on algorithmic scientific method.