4 ms·
I wouldn't call someone who needs a nationwide referendum to silence opposition within his own party a very good leader.
by yabatopia 10y ago
I wouldn't call someone who needs a nationwide referendum to silence opposition within his own party a very good leader.
- Angostura 10y agoIt wasn't just to silence opposition within his own party. It was also to stop the haemorrhaging of support from all mainstream parties towards UKIP. It was a reasonable gamble that failed.
- dajohnson89 10y agoThat's like saying betting the house on one of Germany, Italy, or Spain winning the Euro cup is a reasonable gamble.
- adwf 10y agoYes, people forget that he'd already had two MPs jump ship to UKIP. If he hadn't promised a referendum the party would've split down the middle. What I don't get, and didn't get with the Scots referendum either, is why on earth they didn't require a super-majority? Surely with something as critical as this, you'd want a bit more convincing than a 2% margin? It doesn't have to be a 3/4ths or even 2/3rds, but a 60.1/39.9 split would've been nicely convincing that one side is definitely in a minority. Instead we've just proven once again that the UK is fractured politically North/South/Scotland/NI/etc.
- jacquesm 10y ago> If he hadn't promised a referendum the party would've split down the middle. And now you have a country split down the middle.
- adwf 10y agoYep, not Britain's finest hour at the moment. Scotland have already begun the process for a 2nd independence referendum and will probably win it this time. Northern Ireland are likely to follow. In 5 years time we'll just be talking about England alone. With maybe Cornwall and the North splitting from London and the South East. Might be time to dig up my Scottish ancestry and get a dual passport...
- jacquesm 10y agoDon't forget Spain claiming Gibraltar.
- adwf 10y agoThe odd thing is that after all the years of being staunchly British, Gibraltar might well accept. They were 95% in favour of the EU. Having that border heavily restricted will be a nightmare for them.
- jacquesm 10y agoYes, I think this will happen and likely it will happen on a much shorter time-scale than a Scottish vote for independence and entry into the EU.
- namaemuta 10y agoI would wait a bit to see how things go for UK because Spain current situation isn't that good either.
- vacri 10y agoSpain will try to block Scotland entering the EU, to fend off Catalonian separatism.
- DonaldFisk 10y agoIf the Scottish independence referendum had resulted in Scotland gaining independence from the UK (like Spain, then a EU country) and then applied to join, there might be a reason for Spain to worry, as that roughly mirrors the situation with Catalonia. If there's another Scottish independence referendum, Scotland would gain independence from a NON-EU country (UK) and then apply to join. This is similar to the situation with Slovenia, which gained independence from Yugoslavia and then joined the EU. Spain didn't veto that.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> Yes, people forget that he'd already had two MPs jump ship to UKIP. If he hadn't promised a referendum the party would've split down the middle. Arguably, allowing a partisan realignment wherein people would vote for representatives balancing views on the EU with other policy concerns would have been healthier for the nation (if more disruptive to the elites of the existing major parties) than trying to preserve the existing party structure by splitting out the EU issue to a referendum. And, it probably would have been more likely to succeed at keeping the UK in the EU.