4 ms·
Though not explicitly written in the article, it seemed to me that JJ was recommending this approach for dealing with short-lived 'topic' branches like bug fixe
by santry 17y ago
Though not explicitly written in the article, it seemed to me that JJ was recommending this approach for dealing with short-lived 'topic' branches like bug fixes and small features. At least, that was the nature of each example branch he gave.
I agree with you that if you have a longer-lived branch that's shared among repositories, you'll want to see that merge in the history and optionally squash some of the commits as needed. For short lived topic branches, I often like to squash down to a single commit.