2 ms·
The problem with Boston is you can't get around. Commutes average something staggering like a 10 mph average, and even from within the 128 belt to Boston can b
by acomjean 10y ago
The problem with Boston is you can't get around. Commutes average something staggering like a 10 mph average, and even from within the 128 belt to Boston can be 1 hour+[1].
If you are fortunate to own property near the subway, prices are going through the roof. (they've almost hit 900$/sf in my 1940, needs a new roof brick building in cambridge. 700,000$ for 800sf.). Nobody wants the hour+ commute.
Add to that public transit isn't being improved in any serious way. Drive/train doesn't work as the lots are at capacity. The current growth is fueled by improvements in the big dig done years ago. This is an urban vs rural part of the state problem, were populations are decreasing and they don't have transit, so don't want to subsidize at the state level.
I want the region to be great, but its lagging. I see smart people leaving all the time.
At least they are building in the core...
[1]https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/regionals/2015/09/17/zocommute/6oAfphVXJRcUJYM4RAFTWK/story.html https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/regionals/2015/09/17/zocom...
- mc32 10y agoGotta agree there. The roads are horrendous --they are worse than bay area highways, with only I-880 coming close. Average speed seems slower and peak traffic lasts longer (there are hardly any lulls, except for well into the evening). I'd love to see more rail, but they need to widen their main highways (the occasional allowed extra shoulder does not cut it) or build new highways --and I'd wish they'd hire someone from Caltrans to spearhead the Mass-DOT, to modernize the way they do interchanges. They also probably need a Hy-128 rail corridor (rails is all in and out of Bos)