> Your comment was downvoted because it was rude and confrontational. I didn't read that at all. The situation, as it stands, involves claims and counterclaim

> Your comment was downvoted because it was rude and confrontational. I didn't read that at all. The situation, as it stands, involves claims and counterclaims and only one side of the argument appears as third-party verifiable. It's only natural to question why an apparent rebuttal from Microsoft doesn't come with any transparency (again!) IMO, down voting the GP for pointing this out is bullshit.