3 ms·
It's immigration. California has had negative net domestic migration for a while. Population growth in the state is driven by immigration.
by khuey 10y ago
It's immigration. California has had negative net domestic migration for a while. Population growth in the state is driven by immigration.
- dadkins 10y agoDon't forget natural growth, i.e. birth. According to census estimates, California had a natural population increase of 1,332,394 (births - deaths) from April 2010 -- August 2015. In that same period it had a net immigration of 568,884 people, consisting of +834,999 international and -266,115 domestic. On the other hand, when you look at the San Francisco bay area metropolitan region, you'll see that there's no domestic exodus and a net immigration of 274,598 people over the last five years. [http://factfinder.census.gov/bkmk/table/1.0/en/PEP/2015/PEPTCOMP/0400000US06|310M200US41860|310M200US41940 http://factfinder.census.gov/bkmk/table/1.0/en/PEP/2015/PEPT...] So, yeah, with a little over ~90,000 new people per year in the region, the picture looks very different than the one the article was trying to paint.