> it can find things like the "sine function" via examples of inputs and outputs I really like the idea, and reading through comments this question came to my

> it can find things like the "sine function" via examples of inputs and outputs I really like the idea, and reading through comments this question came to my mind. Names are important for us. They synthesize what a "thing" is, and they help us organize knowledge. So even though it might be true that for computers names are not that important (i can describe what i want), i believe they are for us, humans, when trying to understand a given system. We grow systems both for humans and for computers. What's your take on this? How would you find balance between the two?