Am I the only person that is wary of 100% https ? Remember, once you encrypt a web resource in SSL, you add a ton of baggage on top of any methods that might b

Am I the only person that is wary of 100% https ? Remember, once you encrypt a web resource in SSL, you add a ton of baggage on top of any methods that might be used to access it. I like a world in which I can 'nc' a web resource and manipulate it with unix primitives without a truckload of software dependencies. If sensitive information is involved, then certainly - use SSL. I understand that we must give up conveniences for that functionality. But there are a lot of web resources that have existed, do exist, and potentially exist that are completely benign ... I think we're shackling ourselves by chasing after this perfection. Or, put another way, we're chaining ourselves to a world where web resources are only accessed by web browsers, and only by those web browsers that are chaining themselves to a fairly dubious security scheme...