4 ms·
Why only 3 years ago? Maybe 10 years will be little more accurate? git shortlog -sne --since '10 years ago' 1298 Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.
by moloh 10y ago
Why only 3 years ago?
Maybe 10 years will be little more accurate?
git shortlog -sne --since '10 years ago'
1298 Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net>
481 David Lawrence Ramsey <pooka109@gmail.com>
382 Chris Allegretta <chrisa@asty.org>
28 Jordi Mallach <jordi@gnu.org>
3 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
3 Mike Scalora <mike@scalora.org>
2 Rishabh Dave <rishabhddave@gmail.com>
git shortlog -sne --since '15 years ago'
2528 David Lawrence Ramsey <pooka109@gmail.com>
1298 Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net>
803 Chris Allegretta <chrisa@asty.org>
355 Jordi Mallach <jordi@gnu.org>
3 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
3 Mike Scalora <mike@scalora.org>
2 Rishabh Dave <rishabhddave@gmail.com>
1 Rocco Corsi <rocco.corsi@sympatico.ca>
Well, now looks little different...
- threeseed 10y ago2001 was when Windows XP was released. That's at least a few "eras" in computing ago. Any open source project is only as good as it is today not what it was.
- digi_owl 10y agoThen again, in many orgs XP is barely being replaced with Windows 7...
- belorn 10y agoIf you like to test it, I would be very interested in the result of trying to get linux running with only code written from the last 3 years. I would assume that almost a majority of the code would be there, but then I would also assume that most of the essential core is basically untouched except for security patches. It would make for a very interesting read and a HN worthy article. Have kernel images doubled in the last years?