4 ms·

I'm pretty sure it needs to show that she knowingly and willingly transmitted marked classified data she knew was classified to persons she explicitly knew didn

I'm pretty sure it needs to show that she knowingly and willingly transmitted marked classified data she knew was classified to persons she explicitly knew didn't have clearance while showing blatant disregard for security. There hasn't been any evidence so far of this.

protomyth 10y ago
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-on-her-private-server-wrote-104-emails-the-government-says-are-classified/2016/03/05/11e2ee06-dbd6-11e5-81ae-7491b9b9e7df_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-on-her-priva... http://static.politico.com/f3/9b/19d29ab14abeb4a30ca2975f1e6c/oig-report.pdf http://static.politico.com/f3/9b/19d29ab14abeb4a30ca2975f1e6...
- res0nat0r 10y ago
  The bar hasn't been met for her to somehow be indicted no matter how much Reddit wishes it to be true. From the 2nd link: What OIG Recommends: OIG makes eight recommendations. They include issuing enhanced and more frequent guidance on the permissible use of personal email accounts to conduct official business, amending Departmental policies to provide for administrative penalties for failure to comply with records preservation and cybersecurity requirements, and developing a quality assurance plan to address vulnerabilities in records management and preservation. The Department concurred with all of OIG’s recommendations.
  - protomyth 10y ago
    I have a reddit account but don't really comment there so I have no clue about the first line. The OIG report is recommending system changes and doesn't opinion on the criminal. That's what the FBI is doing.
    - res0nat0r 10y ago
      I wouldn't hold my breath because I think you will be pretty disappointed.
      - protomyth 10y ago
        Let me quote myself: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11957648 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11957648 > I think she honestly believes she can survive and nothing will come of it. She is probably right. Stop projecting on people what will disappoint us.
        res0nat0r 10y ago
        Then why bother repeatedly trying to point out and imply the FBI is going to find something when there is no evidence thus far of anything like that being the case...?
        protomyth 10y ago
        Because there is plenty of evidence she broke the law.

protomyth 10y ago

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-on-her-private-server-wrote-104-emails-the-government-says-are-classified/2016/03/05/11e2ee06-dbd6-11e5-81ae-7491b9b9e7df_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-on-her-priva... http://static.politico.com/f3/9b/19d29ab14abeb4a30ca2975f1e6c/oig-report.pdf http://static.politico.com/f3/9b/19d29ab14abeb4a30ca2975f1e6...

res0nat0r 10y ago
The bar hasn't been met for her to somehow be indicted no matter how much Reddit wishes it to be true. From the 2nd link: What OIG Recommends: OIG makes eight recommendations. They include issuing enhanced and more frequent guidance on the permissible use of personal email accounts to conduct official business, amending Departmental policies to provide for administrative penalties for failure to comply with records preservation and cybersecurity requirements, and developing a quality assurance plan to address vulnerabilities in records management and preservation. The Department concurred with all of OIG’s recommendations.
- protomyth 10y ago
  I have a reddit account but don't really comment there so I have no clue about the first line. The OIG report is recommending system changes and doesn't opinion on the criminal. That's what the FBI is doing.
  - res0nat0r 10y ago
    I wouldn't hold my breath because I think you will be pretty disappointed.
    - protomyth 10y ago
      Let me quote myself: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11957648 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11957648 > I think she honestly believes she can survive and nothing will come of it. She is probably right. Stop projecting on people what will disappoint us.
      - res0nat0r 10y ago
        Then why bother repeatedly trying to point out and imply the FBI is going to find something when there is no evidence thus far of anything like that being the case...?
        protomyth 10y ago
        Because there is plenty of evidence she broke the law.