4 ms·
Well, they would be as technically valid as any other updated cert, and they would not violate any laws since a judge somewhere would have rubber stamped it, so
by 5ilv3r 10y ago
Well, they would be as technically valid as any other updated cert, and they would not violate any laws since a judge somewhere would have rubber stamped it, so I just don't think that word fraudulent could apply in any actionable sense.
Morally wrong, sure, but you know, politicians and law enforcement...
- pfg 10y agoFraudulent is not usually a term that's referring to legal assessments when talking about the CA system. Various browsers and root programs are (to keep the comparison) both the executive and judiciary branch of the CA system, and if certificates are issued in a way that's not allowed in those policies (which would certainly be the case in this scenario), it would be considered fraudulent and could lead to root removal.