4 ms·
No. The rift is not over the license itself. From the mail archive Benno states... > > As you know, I will not assign my copyright to the FSF, nor to > > a
by rmmm 10y ago
No. The rift is not over the license itself. From the mail archive Benno states...
> > As you know, I will not assign my copyright to the FSF, nor to
> > anyone else. All the code I write is GPL'ed. You don't need to
> > own the copyright on any code in order to be able to enforce the
> > GPL. [...]
>
> Indeed, and in fact for a long time the copyright was owned by me
> before it was assigned to the FSF. It's not required per se, but
> generally speaking, there must be a Maintainer of the Software who
> believes in the ideals of the GNU system
I do believe in the ideal of the GNU system: to have computer systems
that consist entirely of libre software.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nano-devel/2016-05/msg00021.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nano-devel/2016-05/msg000...
- Annatar 10y agoThat's a shame. Benno also did not want to assign copyright to the FSF for his contributions. I'm still glad he did not want to assign copyright over to the FSF (while I firmly believe in free and open source software, I'm dead set against GNU is not UNIX and the Free Software Foundation).