Since you brought up Apple... How is it that Apple was legally bound to sell the FaceTime app for Mac OS X, or the 802.11n update, because adding new features t

Since you brought up Apple... How is it that Apple was legally bound to sell the FaceTime app for Mac OS X, or the 802.11n update, because adding new features to an already sold product crossed some weird accounting issue, but Sony had to be sued when they removed an advertised feature and forced to compensate for the loss? The law doesn't make sense most of the time. http://forums.macrumors.com/threads/apple-launches-0-99-mac-facetime-app-on-mac-app-store.1101731/ http://forums.macrumors.com/threads/apple-launches-0-99-mac-... http://www.macrumors.com/2011/02/24/apples-0-99-facetime-charge-due-to-accounting-requirements/ http://www.macrumors.com/2011/02/24/apples-0-99-facetime-cha...