> If we do that we might as well use a lightning to 3.5 jack-adapter You mean a lightning to 3.5 and an usb-c to 3.5 one. With mandatory Apple/USB tax, DRM may

> If we do that we might as well use a lightning to 3.5 jack-adapter You mean a lightning to 3.5 and an usb-c to 3.5 one. With mandatory Apple/USB tax, DRM may or may not be included, and questionable DAC quality. A fully passive 2.5→3.5 adapter is much easier, would work with all vendors, and has no potential DRM backdoor capability. And we'd probably quickly see headphones with native 2.5mm plug and an included 3.5mm adapter, just like we currently have for "high-end" (read: $100) headsets and 6.35mm.