3 ms·
I'm sure what the poster meant was the Pico wasn't free/libre software. edit: > because Pico's earlier license was not a free software license, since distribu
by RMarcus 10y ago
I'm sure what the poster meant was the Pico wasn't free/libre software.
edit:
> because Pico's earlier license was not a free software license, since distribution of a modified version of the code was ambiguously forbidden.
- nailer 10y agoI meant open source, but same requirement to allow distribution of modified software appears in both the free software list of freedoms [1] and the open source definition [2]. 1. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html 2. https://opensource.org/osd-annotated https://opensource.org/osd-annotated