5 ms·

But some survived. How many survived with zero food?

• klibertp 10y ago
  To be clear, I'm arguing the other way around: not that you can survive complete lack of food, but that there are people who did not survive complete lack of love.
  • reddytowns 10y ago
    That's confusing coincidence with causality. You can't prove "complete lack of love", whatever that means, killed them.
    • klibertp 10y ago
      I used "complete lack of love" as a short version of what another commenter wrote: "horrific orphanage experiences, growing up abused, and a complete lack of love". I can agree that "complete lack of love" is rather hard to define, but are you sure that it's just a coincidence, when an abused, humiliated, tortured person commits suicide?
      • jacalata 10y ago
        I'm confident it did cause some of them to commit suicide. I am arguing, as someone else said - some of them made it. Nobody survived without food. Therefore it is silly to suggest love is more fundamental than food to survival.