4 ms·
On the one hand, in the Internet age, I'm not as concerned about what's in a textbook, since students are likely to just Google what they need to get their home
by makecheck 17y ago
On the one hand, in the Internet age, I'm not as concerned about what's in a textbook, since students are likely to just Google what they need to get their homework done.
Yet, the apparent lack of consultation that went into these decisions is alarming. These people can't possibly be experts in all subjects, but they made changes as if they were. This means they were being righteous instead of responsible.
Personally, I suspect the new material will be misleading, and even wrong, in some important ways. But even if you agree with the changes, can you really be comfortable with the approach used to achieve them?
- greenlblue 17y agoIt's not like the current history books are any more accurate. The old books were also designed and voted on by some committee just as ideological as this one. History is a fascinating subject but I sure as hell didn't learn any of the fascinating stuff in my middle school or high school history classes.
- borism 17y agoit wouldn't be surprising if 90s history books are more accurate and less ideological than 80s or 2010s books.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]