6 ms·
None of that is saying bad things about Solar City's balance sheet in the 5-20 year horizon -- quite the opposite.
by jbooth 10y ago
None of that is saying bad things about Solar City's balance sheet in the 5-20 year horizon -- quite the opposite.
- prostoalex 10y agoThe lease payments do not make it to SCTY's balance sheet, they're securitized and sold as SolarBonds, a financial beast of their own, with no secondary market, no default protection and no rating from a ratings agency.
- toomuchtodo 10y agoI've currently invested in Solar Bonds, and am comfortable with the risks they present. I don't need a secondary market and I'm not worried about vast amounts of people no longer paying their electric bill. I treat it like a riskier CD, no more no less.
- semi-extrinsic 10y ago> I'm not worried about vast amounts of people no longer paying their electric bill No one was worried about vast amounts of people no longer paying their subprime mortgages either. Not saying your investment strategy is wrong, but "predictions are difficult, especially about the future".
- toomuchtodo 10y agoSignificant difference between "triple A" sausage CDOs stuffed with subprime junk and Solar City obligations.
- Bartweiss 10y agoAmong other differences, instruments tend to be a bit better priced when you're not lying about what's in them!
- falsestprophet 10y agoYes they do. Solar Bonds are unsecured Solar City debt.
- prostoalex 10y agoIf the lease payments backing the bond stop, Solar City will attempt to rectify the situation, but it's not responsible for the remainder of the debt in any fashion. This specific aspect of operation is similar to other online servicers, like LendingClub, which would not compensate you in the event of a peer-to-peer loan default. The prospectus https://solarbonds.solarcity.com/assets/bond_document/180/?filename=prospectus https://solarbonds.solarcity.com/assets/bond_document/180/?f... lists the following risks (among others). • your inability to initiate bankruptcy proceedings against SolarCity; • the lack of certain “customary” investor protective covenants in the indenture; • your inability to require us to repurchase the Solar Bonds upon a change of control of SolarCity; • lack of cross-default provisions in the indenture with respect to our other debt; and • the lack of an underwriter to conduct third party due diligence and other types of “gatekeeper” actions typically taken by an underwriter in an underwritten public offering.