2 ms·
So you are implying that makes it okay to assume everyone accused is guilty for all intents and purposes?
by hueving 10y ago
So you are implying that makes it okay to assume everyone accused is guilty for all intents and purposes?
- tptacek 10y agoI feel like lots of people here are patting each other on the back about a snipey "innocent until proven guilty" argument they've derived by cutting one of this post's sentences in half. No, this post does not say it's "okay to assume everyone accused is guilty for all intents and purposes".
- PavlovsCat 10y agoNo, those two comments are simply asking. Which is fair enough, seeing how the comment doesn't say why that is "not justice", or any different from other witnesses/victims in other trials getting asked questions.