4 ms·
It could be done in a way that isn't cruel. Just take a little at a time, like we do with humans. It might not even be less efficient if the rate of blood produ
by aninhumer 10y ago
It could be done in a way that isn't cruel. Just take a little at a time, like we do with humans. It might not even be less efficient if the rate of blood production is fairly constant. (I don't know enough biology to speculate.)
- saynsedit 10y agoIt's cruel to take a human's blood without their consent, even if done painlessly.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- aninhumer 10y agoI don't think it would be cruel for animals, because once you remove pain as a factor, the only suffering left for humans exists on a psychological level that I don't believe animals would experience.
- saynsedit 10y agoOkay, I don't believe you would suffer at a psychological level either, does that give me the right to take your blood without your consent?
- tkyjonathan 10y agoWhat for though? Cant you spice something in a particular way instead of bleeding an animal?
- aninhumer 10y agoMaybe it's not necessary. My point is just that it would be possible.