3 ms·
I'm starting to understand your position a little better. You're against someone being open when they disagree with something, whether or not their position is
by boundring 10y ago
I'm starting to understand your position a little better.
You're against someone being open when they disagree with something, whether or not their position is valid?
That's a little ridiculous. Being Taoist in withdrawal from conflict is one thing, but being a responsible member of a group is another.
- jacquesm 10y agoYou keep putting words in my mouth, the parent comment is a classic strawman and I refuse to be drawn out into a debate at this level. Good luck.
- boundring 10y agoWhat strawman?
- mixmastamyk 10y agoMy observer take is that you two (and perhaps others) seem to disagree on the definition of the word "disagreement" (haha). Jacques appears to take a view that disagreement (or "picking battles") is tantamount to a fist fight, which obviously should be avoided. But, I think the OP and others discussing here rather think of of it as merely a difference of opinion, to be noted and moved past. In that sense, "avoiding disagreement" is not helpful because they are not noted, but buried.