2 ms·
It's not the learning process that is in question, but the ramifications of really extending the industrial revolution to distributing broken code. (No languag
by alankay1 10y ago
It's not the learning process that is in question, but the ramifications of really extending the industrial revolution to distributing broken code.
(No language has ever been more set up to allow tinkering with everything for the purpose of learning than Smalltalk -- I think you probably realize this.)
I think most people would not recognize most exiting OSs in use by your definition in your second paragraph.
- qwertyuiop924 10y agoOkay. What is the definition of the OS in your opinion? And thank you for taking the time to disagree with me respectfully. So many do not. And I do recognize the tinkering capabilities of smalltalk. This is why I found your points odd. I have yet to learn Smalltalk. The full environment, as opposed to text editor development feels odd to me, especillay after struggling with monsters like Eclipse. Also, SBE is several years out of date, and there isn't really much in the way of good documentation for those who don't already know what they're doing.