3 ms·
There's more than enough evidence for him to have been fired "in that article alone"; of course a rape charge would have to be prosecuted, my saying he should b
by gnaritas 10y ago
There's more than enough evidence for him to have been fired "in that article alone"; of course a rape charge would have to be prosecuted, my saying he should be in jail doesn't mean "without due process". Firing someone however requires no due process, several women complaining about harassment is more than enough.
- collyw 10y agoI hope you never have to server jury duty if that is enough evidence for you.
- gnaritas 10y agoThe bar for firing is much lower than the bar for imprisonment, you obviously can't see that, but it's true none the less. That article contains first hand testimony of multiple incidence of abuse and names numerous witnesses so it's all easily verifiable; if that's not enough evidence for you to fire someone, you need to reevaluate your standards. If you wouldn't fire him for those complaints, you're complicit in his abusive behavior.
- collyw 10y agoYou seem to have changed your argument from the original post, where there was no talk of firing. Anyway, go on and argue your strawman.
- gnaritas 10y agoThat would be true if you were replying to the original post, but you weren't, I clarified the jobs thing and then you replied to it so no, it isn't a moved goal post or a straw man, so go on and try another line of reason or move along.