3 ms·
The "trouble" group is the result of splitting them out. You don't end up with a whole room of problematic kids and a couple of misidentified gifted kids when t
by theorique 10y ago
The "trouble" group is the result of splitting them out. You don't end up with a whole room of problematic kids and a couple of misidentified gifted kids when they are mixed.
It depends on the specific kind of "trouble". If you have students who don't get the material, and need extra assistance, that's one thing. At least they don't "disrupt the learning environment" (as they say the edu-speak that teachers and administrators use).
On the other hand, if they are bored, really don't want to be there, blurt out things at random, make animal sounds to amuse themselves, etc., this affects other students and the whole mood of the classroom. (To say nothing of threats, hostile behavior, actual violence, etc.) Such students need to be physically removed in order to enable the others to learn undisrupted.
- dpark 10y agoSure. There are legitimate reasons to remove students. What's not really legitimate is pulling out all the high performers and leaving the average and below-average students stuck with those legitimate problem students. It's more fair that the kid who excels in English gets put in the same class as the kid who struggles than it is that the kid who struggles with English gets put into the same class with the kid who makes animal noises randomly.