4 ms·

Hmmm... interesting concept.. I would add some features personally. A lot of the time typeahead calls for more than just a string, there should be away to displ

• alediaferia 10y ago
  If you look at the Documentation section do you manage to find the API post you're looking for?
  • cphoover 10y ago
    Hmm If I were to design this... I would make it so that you don't have to replace the entire data source each time... I think a "suggestion" entry in the data source should be represented as it's own entity in the API... e.g instead of PUT /api/datasource/<UUID> overriding the entire datasource each time.. allow an api user to insert lines of text or rich objects. POST /api/datasource/<UUID>/suggestion { ... } or support bulk insertion. POST /api/datasource/<UUID>/suggestion [ { ... },... ] This works better for scaling when you can't just replace all suggestions in one request (like an ETL like operation for a very large dataset). Then you can also allow for updating single "suggestion" entities without replacing the whole dataset. I also think you should support rich objects, allow for things like boosting rules, different templates for object types, spelling correction, synonyms. I think this type of service would be really useful.
    • alediaferia 10y ago
      This is a great piece of advice. Thank you very much. I'll try and investigate this opportunity. Anyway, if you're interested most of the code in the web-service relies on: http://github.com/alediaferia/prefixmap http://github.com/alediaferia/prefixmap