I hear your sentiment. But not your argument as much. Politicians and Lawyers are inherently > smart contract writers? 'I think more people will be pissed when

I hear your sentiment. But not your argument as much. Politicians and Lawyers are inherently > smart contract writers? 'I think more people will be pissed when they find out that "trust in the system" ultimately means "trust the writer of the smart contract".' How is this different than not trusting Lawyers? 'Unlike law, which has admitted that insane things happen and provides "emergency stops" (ie: Supreme Court can say whatever the heck they want and provide a check against any of Congress's laws)... there isn't really a way to add human "emergency stops" to the equation of Ethereum.' Agreed on using Ethereum contracts anytime in the near future (or ever) for anything life or death or over exposing your self financially is insane. There are plenty of cases that are a better fit for a smart contract system. People should invest affordable proportions of their money.