4 ms·
I am waiting for my copy to land in the mail before reading this. You are correct, LRB is generally not easily fooled into writing puff pieces; O'Hagen is a ve
by vithlani 10y ago
I am waiting for my copy to land in the mail before reading this.
You are correct, LRB is generally not easily fooled into writing puff pieces; O'Hagen is a very sharp writer (check out his masterly analysis of Assange who is much more capable of blowing smoke than Wright).
My prediction is that this will be looked upon more as a an essay about digital con men, and this is why M-K Willmers allowed it to be published.
FWIW, I say Neal Stephenson is Satoshi :)
- cookiecaper 10y agoHey, it appears you're shadowbanned. I vouched for this comment because I don't see how it violates any rules, and it seems on-topic and useful. I checked your history and every comment you've made over the last several months (at least) is marked dead, which means only people who've enabled the "showdead" option in their profile can read them. It's a shame as most of the ones I saw look fine.
- vithlani 10y agoThank you.
- selimthegrim 10y agoSeymour Hersh has been doing a pretty good snow job on them lately on the Bin Laden thing, (Syria was a little more credible)
- vithlani 10y agoSnow job? As in.... obfuscating? I happen to agree with all the recent LRB Hersh pieces on Osama and Syria.