3 ms·
It's a little disingenuous to call what Gawker does "dissent". It's also disingenuous to pretend Gawker has some new and clever business model - it's just tabl
by gozur88 10y ago
It's a little disingenuous to call what Gawker does "dissent". It's also disingenuous to pretend Gawker has some new and clever business model - it's just tabloid journalism without the sort of brakes a good lawyer and basic human decency would normally provide.
Also it's odd the way the author shoehorns Donald Trump in at every opportunity. I get the impression the article would never have been written if Thiel didn't have a connection to someone the author despises.
- npizzolato 10y agoIs it really shoehorning when Thiel's lawyer is threatening Gawker with a lawsuit about an article they wrote about Donald Trump?[1] Seems like that's very relevant. [1] From the article, http://gawker.com/now-peter-thiels-lawyer-wants-to-silence-reporting-on-t-1781918385 http://gawker.com/now-peter-thiels-lawyer-wants-to-silence-r...