The document is, as might be expected, fairly uninteresting. The main take home messages are: a) The US DoD classifies Wikileaks as a "threat", or potential t

The document is, as might be expected, fairly uninteresting. The main take home messages are: a) The US DoD classifies Wikileaks as a "threat", or potential threat. b) This seems to be primarily because troop sizes/equipment/movements might be or have already been leaked. Such information may give the upper hand to potential enemies. c) There are some complains about material on Wikileaks being inaccurate, or edited in such a way as to give a misleading impression of events (a fairly standard complaint). d) They propose trying to out/scapegoat/make an example of anyone who is identified as a wikileaker in the hope that that this will deter openness in government, although so far it seems that they have been unsuccessful in this endeavor. e) Wikileakers seem to be a fairly competent bunch, adhering to security best practices in the handling, anonymising and release of documents, but may still be vulnerable to cyber attacks of various kinds.